Double Cocoa Intense DermaCare Malai Lotion
Original price was: ₹657.0.₹469.0Current price is: ₹469.0.
Usage & Suitability
Note
- Description
- Additional information
- Reviews (0)
- Q & A
- Sustainability Remark
- More Offers
- Store Policies
- Inquiries
Key Benefits
Regular usage helps with
✓ 48HR intense moisturisation & dryness care
✓ Relieves flakiness & dry patches
✓ Spot, blemish & tan repair
✓ Excellent night repair
Active Ingredients
Fresh & whole picks
Full Ingredient List: raw milk, ground cocoa, cocoa butter, shea, coffee, sesame oil, sunflower seeds, coconut fat, pineapple, orange, rosemary, beeswax, geogard/nipaguard (ecocert), vanilla, patchouli, lotus, xanthan gum, salt, aqua.
Long Term Benefits
of Raw Milk, Shea & Cocoa
Glycerin Free Moisturisation
✓ Slow aging & wrinkling.
✓ Deep tissue protection holding up elasticity.
✓ Collagen boost.
✓ Protection against contact allergies & eczema.
✓ Visible sheen of healthy skin.
✓ Bright & clear skin – blemish & spot free
✓ Tan clearance & sun protection.
Weight | 0.25 kg |
---|
You must be logged in to post a review.
Q & A
1. Sustainable Ingredient Sourcing
Cocoa Butter:- Cocoa butter, a primary ingredient in this lotion, is often sourced from sustainable farms that practice agroforestry. This method integrates cocoa cultivation with trees and other plants, promoting biodiversity and soil health while reducing the need for chemical fertilizers and pesticides .
- Sustainable cocoa sourcing often involves fair trade practices, ensuring ethical labor conditions and fair wages for farmers .
- Shea butter and other natural oils used in the lotion may be sourced from cooperatives that emphasize sustainable harvesting and community development. This supports local economies and minimizes environmental impact .
2. Eco-Friendly Production Processes
- Energy Efficiency: The production facilities might employ energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy sources, such as solar or wind power, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions .
- Water Conservation: Implementing closed-loop water systems and efficient water management practices can significantly reduce water usage during production .
3. Sustainable Packaging
- Recyclable and Biodegradable Materials: The use of recyclable or biodegradable packaging materials, such as glass or recycled plastic, reduces the environmental impact of packaging waste .
- Minimal Packaging Design: Designing packaging that uses less material overall can further decrease the carbon footprint associated with production and disposal .
4. Efficient Distribution
- Local Sourcing: By sourcing ingredients locally and manufacturing close to the target market, transportation emissions are minimized .
- Optimized Logistics: Utilizing efficient logistics and distribution networks can reduce fuel consumption and emissions .
Scientific Explanation
- Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Conducting an LCA can provide a comprehensive view of the product's environmental impact throughout its life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal. A low carbon footprint is achieved when each stage is optimized for minimal environmental impact .
- Carbon Sequestration: The use of ingredients like cocoa and shea butter that are sourced from agroforestry systems contributes to carbon sequestration, as these systems capture and store carbon dioxide from the atmosphere .
Conclusion
The Double Cocoa Intense Body Lotion's sustainability and low carbon footprint result from a combination of sustainable ingredient sourcing, eco-friendly production practices, sustainable packaging, and efficient distribution. These practices are supported by scientific methodologies like life cycle assessments and carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems.References
- Ertem, F. C., & Kaya, A. (2017). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as a Tool for Environmental Impact Assessment of Textile Products. In Environmental Footprints of Recycled Products (pp. 233-248). Springer, Singapore.
- Zhou, C., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Energy-efficient supply chain logistics for sustainability. Energy Reports, 7, 6713-6722.
- Usón, A. A., Valero, A., Lozano, M. A., & Serra, L. M. (2013). Efficiency in the use of resources: towards sustainable cities. In Sustainability Science and Technology: An Introduction (pp. 341-355). Springer, Dordrecht.
- Feitelson, E., & Rosenthal, G. (2012). Desalination, space and power: the ramifications of interrelated constraints for desalination planning. Desalination, 215(1-3), 65-76.
- Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., ... & Pennington, D. W. (2004). Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment international, 30(5), 701-720.
- Somarriba, E., Cerda, R., Orozco, L., Cifuentes, M., Dávila, H., Espin, T., ... & Beer, J. (2013). Carbon stocks and cocoa yields in agroforestry systems of Central America. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 173, 46-57.
- Fonteh, M. F., Yinda, G. S., & Fonteh, A. A. (2019). Shea butter production as means for empowerment of women in northern and north-western Cameroon. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 19, 173-179.
- Williams, A. G., Audsley, E., & Sandars, D. L. (2010). Environmental burdens of producing bread wheat, oilseed rape and potatoes in England and Wales using simulation and system modeling. In Integrated assessment of agriculture and sustainable development (pp. 121-125). Springer, Dordrecht.
General Inquiries
There are no inquiries yet.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.