Eco-Green USC A101 is a gentle ultrasonic acidic cleaner. It helps in removing the grease, oil stain, rust, welding marks and other toughest marks and stains from the metal surfaces. Dilution ratio : 20-30 ml in 1ltr
Eco-Green USC A101 Strain Remover
₹1,600.0
Usage/Application | Industrial Stain Remover |
Type | Kitchen Stain Removers, Stain Removers |
Packaging Type | Can |
Packaging Size | 5L |
Form | Liquid |
- Description
- Additional information
- Reviews (0)
- Q & A
- Sustainability Remark
- More Offers
- Store Policies
- Inquiries
Weight | 5 kg |
---|
You must be logged in to post a review.
Q & A
The sustainability and low carbon footprint of Strain Remover products can be attributed to several factors:
1. Biodegradability: Strain Remover products are formulated using biodegradable ingredients. Biodegradable substances break down naturally into simpler, non-toxic compounds over time, reducing their impact on the environment. This contrasts with conventional cleaners that may contain synthetic chemicals which persist in the environment and contribute to pollution.
2. Non-toxic Formulation: These products are designed to be non-toxic, meaning they do not harm aquatic life or ecosystems when they enter water systems. This reduces the overall environmental impact compared to traditional cleaners that often contain harmful chemicals.
3. Reduced Energy Use in Production: The manufacturing process of Strain Remover products likely emphasizes energy efficiency and sustainable practices. Using renewable energy sources and optimizing production processes can significantly lower the carbon footprint associated with manufacturing.
4. Packaging: Sustainable packaging materials, such as recyclable or biodegradable containers, further contribute to reducing the environmental impact. Packaging design that minimizes material use and maximizes recyclability or compostability helps decrease carbon emissions associated with waste disposal.
5. Lifecycle Analysis: A comprehensive lifecycle analysis (LCA) would assess the environmental impacts of Strain Remover products from raw material extraction through to disposal. LCAs often show that sustainably produced products have lower overall environmental impacts compared to conventional alternatives. To provide specific references and data supporting these points, one might refer to studies or reports on the environmental impact of biodegradable cleaners versus conventional cleaners. For instance: -
Environmental Working Group (EWG): The EWG provides ratings and analysis of household cleaning products based on their environmental impact and ingredient safety. Products that score well typically use biodegradable and non-toxic ingredients, contributing to lower environmental impacts. -
Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs): LCAs conducted by manufacturers or independent research organizations can quantify the greenhouse gas emissions and energy use associated with different cleaning products. They often find that biodegradable and sustainably sourced ingredients lead to lower overall carbon footprints. By focusing on these factors—biodegradability, non-toxicity, energy efficiency in production, sustainable packaging, and lifecycle analysis—Strain Remover products can achieve sustainability goals and maintain a low carbon footprint compared to conventional cleaning products.
Calculation Example (Hypothetical)
- Raw Materials: 1 kg of the strain remover might have an emission of 1.5 kg CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) depending on the chemical composition.
- Manufacturing: The energy used in manufacturing could add another 0.5 kg CO2e.
- Packaging: Assuming a plastic bottle, the packaging might contribute 0.3 kg CO2e.
- Transportation: If transported over a long distance, the carbon footprint could add 0.4 kg CO2e.
- Usage: Over its lifetime, the product's usage might add 0.2 kg CO2e.
- End-of-Life: If not recycled, disposal might add another 0.1 kg CO2e.
Total Estimated Carbon Footprint: 3.0 kg CO2e per kg of product.
Conclusion
The total carbon footprint of the Eco-Green USC A101 Strain Remover can be calculated by summing the carbon contributions from each stage of the product’s life cycle. The example provided is hypothetical and actual calculations would require detailed data specific to the product’s formulation, manufacturing, and distribution processes.
General Inquiries
There are no inquiries yet.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.